This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Google Scholar Articles by Owens, R. G. Articles by Slade, P. D. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Owens, R. G. Articles by Slade, P. D. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

So Perfect It's Positively Harmful? Reflections on the Adaptiveness and Maladaptiveness of Positive and Negative Perfectionism

¹ University of Auckland
² Formerly University of Liverpool

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: g.owens{at}auckland.ac.nz.

	Abstract

The article by Flett and Hewitt (2006) highlights a number of important issues in the study of perfectionism and rightly urges caution against simplistic conceptualizations. Their view that the term perfectionism should be reserved for pathological forms of behavior is questionable, though understandable given the perspective from which they view it. But whatever the terminology used, the underlying processes remain unaffected. Relevance of the data they cite in support of an alleged maladaptive side to positive perfectionism, however, rests on the assumption of close parallels between self-oriented perfectionism and positive perfectionism, an assumption that may not be justified. It is important to draw attention not only to differences between the theoretical underpinnings of their and the authors perspectives but also to points of agreement that the authors may previously have failed to make clear. The authors concur entirely with their view that clear avenues of potential research are now apparent that should serve to clarify the issues.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?